/* Footer ----------------------------------------------- */ #footer { width:660px; clear:both; margin:0 auto; } #footer hr { display:none; } #footer p { margin:0; padding-top:15px; font:78%/1.6em "Trebuchet MS",Trebuchet,Verdana,Sans-serif; text-transform:uppercase; letter-spacing:.1em; }

Friday, December 30, 2005

My first collard greens


Long a soul food lover, I've never actually made any. I guess as a northern raised urbanite/suburbanite, I never thought I had the "soul" required to make soul food. But this was my second Christmas in a row at my house, and although last year's fish with mango salsa was a hit, it wasn't quite the traditional fare that everyone in my family or my boyfriend's family is used to. So I decided to kick it up a soul notch and make that soul food staple: collard greens. Those, some easy stewed cabbage, baked mac and cheese provided by my bf's mom, and a huge honey glazed ham made for my first holiday soul food dinner.

So here is what I did:

As a rule of thumb, I'd say one large bunch of greens will serve six to eight people.

First, I bought two raw pork hocks, weighing about 1.2 pounds together.

Some people use smoked. I only used raw because the grocery store I went to didn't have smoked. They had smoked turkey necks, but I don't like seeing necks in my food. Don't ask me what a hock is - it just looks more palatable. Besides, greens ain't greens without pork. In the end, my mother said she preferred the raw hocks because you get more pure pork flavor and less smoke flavor. So that accident worked in my favor.

I boiled the hocks for two or three hours. There is no set time - you just have to keep checking on them every 45 minutes or so. They are done when the meat falls away from the bone. Take the skin off the hocks about halfway into cooking, or whenever it looks ready to fall away from the meat. It's so fatty and if it's not smoked, it's really pretty gross. As the water evaporates, simply fill the pot back up with water.

When the (skinless) hocks are ready, tear the meat away from the bone and break it up into pieces. I left the bones in my greens. I think they add more flavor.

While the hocks are cooking, you should empty and clean your sink, separate the greens leaf by leaf, and soak them in cold water. Drain the sink, fill it again, and give them a second good soaking and rinsing. This is to get rid of any soil that may be left on the greens.

Take about five or six leaves, roll them up, and slice them into 1 or 1.5 inch slices.

Then, put the sliced greens right into the pot with the water and the hock meat and bones. They should wilt down somewhat quickly, allowing you to put more greens in as they do.

Once all the greens are in, it's pretty easy. Cook them until they're done to your desired tendency. Some people like them cooked all the way down until they are soupy and soggy. Some people like them a little more crisp. I like them somewhere in the middle. So I cooked them for about 45 minutes to an hour, over medium or medium-low heat.

The key to tasty collard greens is SEASONED SALT (SS). At least it was for me. The brand I used was Spice Classics Seasoned Salt. You can get this in the dollar store and it tastes better then Lawry's Seasoned Salt, which is the most well-known brand. I cannot tell you how much to use. The way I seasoned the greens was every fifteen minutes, I would add about five or six shakes of SS, wait five minutes, then taste the greens. I found that they were to my liking after about four rounds of this.

Make sure you have hot sauce on hand - preferably Tabasco or Frank's Red Hot - for those who like to heat up their greens before eating. Take the greens out of the water and put them in a bowl for serving, but don't empty that pot! One of the most delicious treasures is in there - pot likker. It's a soup made up of the flavored water, ham hock bits, and collard green shreddings left over from the making of the greens. A bowl of this as an appetizer is great and it is superb on a cold, cold day, especially when you've just come in from shoveling the walk.

My collards were a hit. It was the only dish that was completely gone by the end of the night. Maybe I didn't make enough, but everybody wanted seconds.

My next soul food mission is baked macaroni and cheese and a dessert - perhaps peach cobbler? Nope - sweet potato pie. My favorite.
|

Monday, December 26, 2005

Renewing the powers of COINTELPRO

A hat tip to ThugLifeArmy.com, via Davey D, and props for their great interview with U. S. Rep. Cynthia McKinney from Georgia. This basically supports my view that we are up against the same forces as before. The New York Times reported the other day that the NYPD (maybe others?) deliberately provoked fights and mass arrests during the Republican National Convention protests. One has to wonder if this was isolated; it may be that one would be naive to assume it was.
Rep. Cynthia McKinney - Some records are already released that throw doubt on the officially unsolved murder of Tupac and the police version of the death. It seems clear that Tupac, who came from a family of very militant Black Panther activists, would himself have been followed and surveilled if not attacked by the FBI and their counter-gang programs. In the past this sort of surveillance was called COINTELPRO or Counter-Intelligence Program and aimed at peace, civil rights and militant activists who were working for social change. It not only surveilled people but it infiltrated groups with informants and provocateurs, created fights within groups, spread rumors about leaders, and created the conditions that led to political assassination, framing and imprisonment or destruction of progressive organizations. Senator Frank Church and others held hearings in the 1970s that exposed and made illegal some of the excesses of the FBI, CIA and military intelligence agencies. Soon Church and others on his committee were voted out of office with the help of intelligence agency support for other candidates. Even before 9/11 ongoing programs against Central America activists and youth culture musicians and leaders that looked exactly like COINTELPRO were exposed. After 9/11 Atty General Ashcroft and others called to renew the powers of COINTELPRO and even tried to pretend 9/11 happened because the CIA. FBI and DIA had their hands tied behind their backs the the Church committee rules. If the released records reveal that federal, state and local government agencies and police were violating Tupac's rights or setting the stage for his murder, there should be an outcry for a full investigation, criminal charges, demotions or firings of intelligence agents involved, and a change in the power of intelligence agencies to continue these practices.

The highlighting in italics relates more to the concept of intelligence agencies controlling our elections. That is just scary to me.
|

Reassurance for those who are told they are crazy

Often I am regarded as crazy or somehow abnormal for my seeming obsessive interest in politics. Maybe not in so many words. But there are the little things that indicate as much, like at parties where people have no interest not just in talking politics but no interest in politics, or the news. Or there are people who are interested but think that your recitation of facts and news stories and poll numbers and government acronyms is just a little weird. And they think that you are taking it too far.

For example, I have been participating in the IMPEACH guerrilla marketing project at the Daily Kos, spearheaded by the energetic Kagro X. It has taken off in an amazing way. The energy is just there this time. Impeach Bush web sites and coalitions and PACs have probably existed since 2001, but they have always seemed part of the fringe. Now that the "I-word" has finally entered the traditional media fray, all the pent-up energies are bursting forth. I am exhilarated that this moment has arrived.

I've encountered people who think that the stickers are a bit much. With cajoling, I convinced them that they've gotta be part of this movement. I've had friends accuse me of being a blind liberal and called me "Al Franken." Not that there's anything wrong with that. Others ask me "Oh my gosh, when did you become so political?"

You know what, this is who I am. I am deeply inspired by the movements that came to a head in the 1960s. When I think of these movements, I think of people whom I admire and inspire me, like Paul Robeson, Malcolm X, Rosa Parks. They all became aware at various points in their lives and realized the urgency of what they faced. Really, it's these same forces, still alive, that they struggled and rebelled against, that we are facing now. This resonates with me because I was born in the late 1970s. I had no consciousness of what had happened before me, and I was told that things had gotten a lot better. Indeed they had, but I thought that meant "all better," that there was nothing to worry about. It just took that one night in November of 2000 to trigger that realization and then the consequences - September 11 and its aftermath - changed me forever.

I am sure I am not the only one who's experienced this change. Blogs and the Internet tell me I am not alone, because for some reason it is inapropos to start a political conversation on the street these days (maybe to avoid physical fights, which I can understand). So for those of you who have - let's just admit it - been right from the very start of these dark years, and those of you who are just catching on - maybe those of you who came across an unexplained "IMPEACH" sign on the highway or sticker on the mailbox - let me offer some solace. You're not crazy. You're informed and empowered. It's your job to inform and empower others, even those who are proud never to read a newspaper. The uninformed, unaware, uninterested electorate is partly to blame for the current state of affairs in this country. It's crazy - insane, self-destructive - NOT to be informed. So keep on keeping on. Follow the IMPEACH movement, do your weekly protests, write letters, organize and volunteer while the energy is here and abundant.
|

Thursday, December 22, 2005

Feingold for President


I am officially endorsing Russ Feingold for President in 2008...as a result of this endorsement, I am sure he will see the campaign dollars start flying in (/snark).

Feingold has distinguished himself from the rest of the hopeful pack simply by standing up for American freedoms. Who would have thought it could be that easy? And who would have thought he'd be the only guy to think of such a novel idea?

Plus, he meets my standards for attractiveness in selecting a presidential candidate. I was really taking a step down from Bill Clinton when I voted for Kerry. Sorry.

To learn more about Senator Feingold, follow these links:

Russ Feingold's Senate Web page
Bush Backs Down on Patriot Act
Bush to Continue Domestic Spying
|

No More Palmas Del Mar


I sent a letter to Palmas Del Mar, a Puerto Rico resort I went to last year with my family. The service was so-so, but the actual resort and accomodations were fabulous. I felt like a fat cat.

Well surprise, surprise, it turns out that real fat cats go to Palmas Del Mar. I read this about Tom DeLay - a standup guy - in an AP article:

Public documents reviewed by The Associated Press tell the story: at least 48 visits to golf clubs and resorts with lush fairways; 100 flights aboard company planes; 200 stays at hotels, many world-class; and 500 meals at restaurants, some averaging nearly $200 for a dinner for two.

The meals and trips for DeLay and his associates were paid with donations collected by the campaign committees, political action committees and children's charity the Texas Republican created during his rise to a top spot in Congress.

Put them together and a picture of an opulent lifestyle emerges.

"A life to enjoy. The excuse to escape," Palmas del Mar, an oceanside Puerto Rican resort visited by DeLay, promised in a summer ad on its Web site as a golf ball bounced into a hole and an image of a sunset appeared.

The Caribbean vacation spot has casino gambling, horseback riding, snorkeling, deep-sea fishing and private beaches.

"He was very friendly. We always see the relaxed side of politicians," said Daniel Vassi, owner of the French bistro Chez Daniel at Palmas del Mar. Vassi said DeLay has eaten at his restaurant every year for the past three, and was last there in April with about 20 other people, including the resort's owners.

The restaurant is a cozy and popular place on the yacht-lined marina at Palmas del Mar. Dishes include bouillabaisse for about $35.50, Dover sole for $37.50 and filet mignon for $28.50. Palmas del Mar is also a DeLay donor, giving $5,000 to his Americans for a Republican Majority PAC in 2000.


Using money from a children's charity to live it up in fancy restaurants and golf clubs? The man is going to hell.

Anyway, here is my letter:


Director of Marketing & Communications
Palmas del Mar Properties, Inc.
PO Box 2020
Humacao, PR 00792-2020


In October 2004, my parents, my boyfriend, and I enjoyed a weeklong stay in a Club Cala villa at your resort. Although the services were only fair, the setting and the accommodations were excellent. At the end of the week, we all agreed that we would absolutely return, perhaps in the next year or two.

I am afraid that is no longer going to happen as long as the ownership of Palmas Del Mar continues to support U.S. Rep. Tom DeLay from Texas. I was very troubled to read the following in the Associated Press article headlined “Donors Underwrite DeLay’s Deluxe Lifestyle”:

[text as quoted above]

As you may well know, Mr. DeLay is currently under indictment in Texas for money laundering and conspiracy to engage in money laundering. Beyond these charges, Mr. DeLay has been censured by the House of Representatives on three occasions for ethical lapses. He has received money and gifts from lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who is under indictment and reportedly working out a deal to plead guilty – and is connected to a murder investigation in Florida surrounding his purchase of a floating casino. Further, Mr. DeLay has tainted the political process in Washington by allowing lobbyists to craft business-friendly legislation affecting all Americans, and threatening legislators of both parties in order to secure passage of some of his key votes.

As an American business, perhaps it is in the interest of Palmas Del Mar to subsidize Mr. DeLay’s pattern of corruption in order to ensure that federal laws – meant to protect the people – instead protect corporations. However, I have made it a commitment not to patronize businesses and enterprises that support the Republican party’s culture of corruption nor individual legislators that clearly act not only against the interests of people, but also in a criminal manner. It is simply unacceptable.

Unless representatives from Palmas Del Mar communicate to me – personally – that they will no longer support the present culture of corruption in Washington, please be assured that neither my family nor I will return to your resort. I will continue to seek out and patronize only those businesses that support ethical and responsible government.
|

Saturday, December 17, 2005

Carl Levin says NO to divisive Pentagon shill

He sounds like just the right guy for the job of Pentagon spokesman, doesn't he?
J. Dorrance Smith, the nominee, testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee in a closed session to answer questions about an opinion article in which he accused U.S. television networks of helping terrorists through their partnerships with Al-Jazeera.

But silly Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan is being a liberal obstructionist:
"I have deep concerns about whether or not he should be representing the United States government and the Department of Defense with that kind of attitude and approach," Levin said after Tuesday's hearing.

[...]

Levin called Smith's comments in the article "extreme" and "over the top."

In an opinion piece published in April in The Wall Street Journal, Smith wrote: "Osama bin Laden, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, and al Qaeda have a partner in al-Jazeera and, by extension, most networks in the U.S. This partnership is a powerful tool for the terrorists in the war in Iraq," he wrote.

Smith also singled out U.S. networks, saying "Al-Jazeera has very strong partners in the U.S. _ ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox, CNN and MSNBC. Video aired by Al Jazeera ends up on these networks, sometimes within minutes."


Republican Sen. John Warner from Virginia said he would forward Smith's nomination to the full Senate later in the week, but there is no published report of that happening as of yet.

From the administration perspective, of course J. Dorrance Smith is the perfect man for the job. He comes with "liberal media" credibility having worked at the radically progressive ABC, and he did time under L. Paul Bremer, former head of the Iraq Coalition Provisional Authority, so he is probably well-trained in incompetence, which is a must as part of the administration bureaucracy.

I am so tired of the evasion, lying, obfuscating, taunting, deception and misleading that Scott McClellan and his ilk are so good at. The press represent us. They deserve to be treated with respect. The worst is seeing Scott McClellan figuratively spit on Helen Thomas. The woman is 85 years old. Show her some respect. Treat her like she is old enough to be your grandmother, because she is. McClellan repeatedly impugns Helen Thomas's patriotism and infers that she is on the side of the terrorists and stands against the American people. And they actually let him out of that room. He should be locked up in there and forced to apologize to Helen, and that's Mrs. Thomas to you.

So now they want to install someone at the Pentagon who has already publicly stated that not just Helen Thomas but also all of the mainstream media, including Fox (a ringer, I guess) are in league with the enemy. Why not let's just get this over with and impose the state-run news service starting now? Because that's where we are headed with this attitude and approach.

Cheers to Carl Levin for attempting to get a hold on this nominee. After all, Donald Rumsfeld or George W. Bush are not hiring him, WE are, and we are paying his salary. We shouldn't hand over our hard-earned money to someone who is going to LIE to us and tell us how UNPATRIOTIC we are, and ATTACK our democracy by demonizing the press. That's just foolishness.

So here are the members of the Senate Armed Services Committee. You can click here to find your Senator and tell them that we are not going to hire someone whose main job is to lie to us and hide information:

DEMOCRATS

Carl Levin, Ranking Member (Michigan)
Edward M. Kennedy (Massachusetts)
Robert C. Byrd (West Virginia)
Joseph I. Lieberman (Connecticut)
Jack Reed (Rhode Island)
Daniel K. Akaka (Hawaii)
Bill Nelson (Florida)
E. Benjamin Nelson (Nebraska)
Mark Dayton (Minnesota)
Evan Bayh (Indiana)
Hillary Rodham Clinton (New York)

REPUBLICANS

John Warner, Chairman (Virginia)
John McCain (Arizona)
James M. Inhofe (Oklahoma)
Pat Roberts (Kansas)
Jeff Sessions (Alabama)
Susan M. Collins (Maine)
John Ensign (Nevada)
James M. Talent (Missouri)
Saxby Chambliss (Georgia)
Lindsey O. Graham (South Carolina)
Elizabeth Dole (North Carolina)
John Cornyn (Texas)
John Thune (South Dakota)
|

Thursday, December 15, 2005

Religious division as corporate policy - DISGUSTING




I hope that the population intersected by American (and now Canadian) Christians and Fox News viewers wakes up soon enough and that this dismal, awful spewer of covert and overt propaganda disappears one day. A former producer from Fox News says that (cough) "journalists" were regularly instructed to divide American media consumers - YOU - by invoking religion and questioning people's faiths. Can ya say fascist tyrants?

But what really separates Fox from the competition is its unabashed use of religion as a divisive weapon. Common sense -- and common courtesy -- have long dictated that personal religious beliefs be kept out of news reporting unless the story at hand involves religion. But on Fox, it's not uncommon for an anchor to raise the issue of a guest's religion, or lack thereof, a propos of nothing.

The most glaring example I can recall is a 2002 interview with a guest who had been cited for his charitable acts. At the end of the discussion the anchor said (paraphrasing here), "So I understand you're an atheist." The guest acknowledged that this was so. "Well," said he anchor, "we're out of time now, but I'd be glad to debate you anytime on the existence of God," and, with that, ended the segment.


Well, thanks for the invitation. How sweet.

That's the kind of information I need to know when I get home from work at 6 o'clock - does God exist? Yeah.
|

Wednesday, December 14, 2005

Ain't that America?

Well isn't this a shocker. Donald Rumsfeld may be spying on Americans. Honestly, I already just assumed he was. I mean, he wanted to do it to Seymour Hersh back in the 1970s when Hersh was causing all sorts of trouble for young Rummy (or middle-aged Rummy, I guess). I am sure my name is on some domestic terrorist watchlist, my photo snapped at the recent war protest in Washington D.C. Doesn't bother me one bit. Because I gave up the notion that Americans are truly free, and that the American government is truly good, a long, long time ago.

As evidenced by this article. So now in addition to watching your back while flying, you'll have to worry about being shot on the commute to work. Commuting while brown? Hmmm...
|

Friday, December 02, 2005

We can't have Codey cause he's too good



In a way, I can't blame Dick Codey for not wanting to ascend to governor or senator in New Jersey. The Star-Ledger wrote about Codey's night in the Greystone mental health facility. He brought pizza, threw a Christmas party, spent the night and stayed for breakfast. I wish that the Star-Ledger would post the photos from the newspaper on that awful Web site they have. They show Codey singing along with a patient, having a chat with two residents, and pulling off his sweater to get ready for bed in a barebones mattress and frame.

A political stunt? For what? He's refused to accept a nomination to the Senate, to the sorrow of many New Jersey residents, and he stepped aside and allowed Corzine to purchase the governorship. He doesn't have to grandstand to improve public opinion - he's got a tremendous approval rating and garnered thousands of write-in votes in the recent election. Everyday there is a headline in the newspaper bemoaning his return to president of the state Senate.

But maybe he realizes he can help more people in that position rather than soiling himself and shoving his convictions to the side just to work with the sleazy New Jersey political establishment. As I was writing this post I listened to a caller from New Jersey to the Randi Rhodes show talk about how he, a self-described "radical lunatic," became co-chairman of his Democratic municipal committee. He said that when they voted to endorse a Dem in the 2004 primary, Dean received a majority of the vote but partybrokers told the media they unanimously endorsed Kerry.

Governor Codey is too good for these people. It's a shame. It's not so bad that Corzine is the best we can do, but what is the point if the people cannot choose who governs them. Things have to change. As the radio caller said, we need to stop listening to the radio, sitting on the computer and get involved in local politics. I have procrastinated but I know it is something I have to do. I'll report back later.

Until then, Governor Codey, you've won us over.
|